The Supreme Court today dismissed two contempt cases filed against Secretary to the Treasury. The cases were filed by Samagi Jana Balawegaya (SJB) General Secretary Ranjith Madduma Bandara and National People’s Power Parliamentarian Vijitha Herath, alleging that the Treasury Secretary failed to comply with a Supreme Court order related to the Local Government Elections.
The Bench, comprising Chief Justice Jayantha Jayasuriya and Justices Buwanaka Aluwihare, Priyantha Jayawardena, Vijith K Malalgoda, and Murdu Fernando, dismissed the cases based on the preliminary objections raised by the Secretary to the Treasury.
On the earlier occasion, Senior Counsel Eraj de Silva, representing the Treasury Secretary, argued that the Treasury Secretary lacked the constitutional authority to release funds without the Finance Minister’s warrant. According to Articles 150(1) and (2) of the Constitution, a warrant from the Minister is required to release funds from the consolidated funds. Although budgetary allocations were made in Parliament in December for the Local Government Elections, the release of funds is contingent on parliamentary control and other procedures. The Secretary to the Treasury released funds on the general warrant of the Minister before February 14, 2023. However, on that date, the Cabinet decided to allocate funds only for essential expenses, without specifying election expenses as essential. Consequently, under the Constitution, the Treasury Secretary is no longer authorized to release such funds. Mr. De Silva emphasized that there was no willful disobedience on the part of the Treasury Secretary.
Senior Counsel Eraj De Silva with Daminda Wijeratna, Janagan Sundramoorthy, and N.K. Ashokbharan instructed by Dinesh Vidanapathirana appeared for the Secretary to the Treasury.
